To Have or to Be Fromm Bloomsbury Review
See a Problem?
Cheers for telling us nigh the trouble.
Friend Reviews
Reader Q&A
Community Reviews
Now, jokes aside.
I don't commonly read philosophical books considering I share Lara's, from Doctor Zhivago, view on philosophy. She says: "I am not fond of philosophical essays. I call back a little philosophy should exist added to life and fine art past style of spice, but to brand it one'south speciality seems to me as strange as feeding on nada just pickles"
Philosophy is, to me, a kind of brain game. A little like Sudoku, only with ideas inst To have or to be? Well, it's simple really. To be, of course. To be rich!
Now, jokes aside.
I don't normally read philosophical books because I share Lara's, from Physician Zhivago, view on philosophy. She says: "I am not fond of philosophical essays. I remember a little philosophy should be added to life and art by fashion of spice, just to make it one's speciality seems to me every bit strange as feeding on nothing but pickles"
Philosophy is, to me, a kind of brain game. A piddling like Sudoku, only with ideas instead of numbers. And what's the point of looking at someone's solved Sudoku? Yep, information technology all tallies up, well washed, but what am I supposed to be getting out of information technology?
For this OCD reason or another I decided to tackle this jar of pickles.
As per the title, Fromm talks about two modes of living – through 'having' and through 'being'. You probably already have some general idea of what these two modes are. Fromm's definitions are the common sense's definitions only phrased in longer words
Fromm insists we are currently in crisis (or we were in the 70s but I assume it has got worse since then) and if we don't practise something about it and quick, not but will we be unhappy but nosotros will bring the terminate of the world upon u.s.a.! (Also apparently information technology is today – May 21st,2011.)
At the same fourth dimension, he presents u.s. with the long history of consumerism, illness equally erstwhile as the humankind itself. He goes from Quondam Attestation to Jesus, from Meister Eckhert to Marx and analyses views on 'having' and 'being' throughout centuries. That'due south the strongest part of the volume, because later Fromm plunges into moaning and rambling.
He gets a bit paranoid and even insists that the fact we say 'my dentist' or 'my lawyer' indicates our obsession with possessing things and people.
Basically, everything would be a lot improve if we stopped chasing later things and commencement 'being' instead. He even postulates that the fear of death would desert us if we practise that. According to Fromm, we fear dying because we fear losing all things nosotros've accumulated such equally condition, houses, cars, wives, husbands, children etc. Fair enough, indeed nosotros lose all that when we die but I don't see how turning to 'being' would save us from the fear of decease. When we die, we essentially cease to exist every bit much every bit we finish to 'take'. And so what'due south your signal over again, Mr Fromm? No wonder that chapter was only a page long.
He also condemns any rivalry, like, God forbid, the Olympic Games. How he imagines humankind without rivalry is beyond me but he wouldn't be the first Utopian similar that.
He talks about how nosotros accept created a religion out of possessions. I thought he was going overboard with this, I certainly don't pray to my Kindle, merely then I read this: http://www.cnn.com/2011/TECH/gaming.thousand...
So maybe he has a point.
He says that we are a order of people permanently unhappy, solitary, fearful, depressed, subversive, addicted… Wow. Actually, are nosotros? And when it comes to fearful I doubt we accept anything on people from the Eye Ages who lived in the constant fright of Heaven's wrath.
He explains that consumerism leads to unhappiness because null will satisfy united states of america. We can accept all the finest things, we get the best nutrient, nosotros collect lovers, we even desire wives, husbands, then nosotros want children but we volition never be happy if we consider all these things in categories of 'having' because this kind of need is insatiable. This is a audio argument but Pierces put it so much better in 3 and a half minute and the well-nigh complicated word they utilise is 'ménage à trois': http://world wide web.youtube.com/lookout?v=UPBbRC...
So while he evidently makes sense at times, we shouldn't do all that he wants us to practise or life would get rather tiresome, literature would cease to be and the civilisation would return to its initial hunting-gathering phase. I am going to keep my possessions, I like them very much, thank you.
All the same, he did win me over but a piffling bit at some betoken. I even thought: "hey, maybe I tin can stop hoarding books like a madwoman if that's going to save the world." Just when I idea good old Fromm is maybe not completely stupid subsequently all he came with his last chapter where he offered his own ideas on how to save the planet. He went directly up loco. Listen to this:
Fromm says that in that location has been very lilliputian attempt put into studying and experimenting with new social/political systems. (I beg to differ; I think there has been quite plenty. My country, for example, lost 50 years to one of those experiments.)
Hither is what we should do:
First we all need to acknowledge we take a trouble and that we are unhappy. Then a true change in our characters will occur. Once that is done, more changes in the political structure should be implemented, as follows.
At that place should exist a council created that would assess utility of ALL the products entering the market, and products that are non institute to have whatever utilitarian value but that only drive people to unbridled consumerism would take to be distributed with special warnings. "The Council of mentally safe products warns: Gucci bags will somewhen make y'all, and those around you lot, very unhappy". This council volition be made up of psychologists, anthropologists, philosophers and theologians.
Meanwhile the government will subsidize the production of all the useful products until people commencement ownership them and the subsiding will no longer exist necessary. Though, of grade, Fromm admits that the biggest difficulty lies in making the consumers realise that they are
against consumerism.
There should too be created hundreds (!) of groups counting most 500 members each which would then exist supplied with all the necessary data so they can contend and vote on all the matters regarding economy, international affairs, health, education and other aspects of mutual interest. Those groups volition, of course, be free from any external influence or pressure.
There will besides be a guaranteed annual income for Everyone, so no one will have to be stuck in a job they detest in fear of starvation. Fromm says that guaranteed annual income will give everyone liberty and independence and THAT's why and so far no system has had the guts to adopt it.
Except for that, there should too be created Cultural Council that would hire about 100 people and exist generously financed so information technology can commission all sort of specialist research and propose the authorities. It would also be in charge in gathering ALL the information and news and presenting information technology to the citizens in an objective fashion (as newspapers and other traditional media cannot be trusted in that matter). Information technology would supervise a big group of journalists who would supply all that objective data.
That's just bananas. Well, at least that would solve for good the problem of unemployment.
*I read this book in Shine translation so my (para)phrasing might not be accurate.
...more than
Fromm contends that an orientation towards having creates a subject - object human relationship with our environment. Nosotros interact with it through trying to possess it, through trying to possess property, knowledge and fifty-fifty people. Don't concur? Just look at these common expressions "I have a married woman and two kids" or "I have a Liberal arts caste". I am the possessor they are the objects, instead of "I am a Liberal Arts major" or "I am a married man and a male parent of two". It seems small-scale but it betrays how we have come to almost unconsciously define our world. It also has further implications that we enlarge and find fulfillment in our lives through not just possessing just possessing more.
Information technology is interesting to me that upon pondering why some men physically corruption their wives I was always confounded past why the unwarranted cruelty towards the mother of their children and frequently best-friends. That is when after reading this it all clicked, and that for these men they view their wife and children as property "objects" and thus he can exercise as he pleases. I mean this even explains Jealousy. If you view relationships as holding that you have, similar "I have a all-time-friend" than you will obviously suffer from jealousy when you lot feel someone else has trespassed against yous and your "holding".
This book has caused me to seriously evaluate my own life and how much of it I spend intellectualizing and categorizing in the name of trying to possess an understanding of it. All the while neglecting to just be fully present and live without judgement, without assay simply be completely lost inside the very present of being. I will definitely work on this.
I also enjoyed how Fromm has essentially conceptualized and 'westernized' Buddhist and even mystical christian thought, into something not only more palatable for the agnostic western student, but for the western listen in full general.
"We fear, and consequently avoid, taking a pace into the unknown, the uncertain; for indeed, while the step may non appear risky to us after we have taken it, before we take that step the new aspects across it appear very risky, and hence frightening. Only the old, the tried, is safe; or so it seems. Every new footstep contains the danger of failure, and that is ane of the reasons people are then afraid of freedom"
"One has but to call back the wild, crazy enthusiasm with which people participated in the various wars of the past two centuries--- the readiness of millions to risk national suicide in lodge to protect the epitome of "the strongest ability," or of "honor" or of profits. And for another example, consider the frenzied nationalism of people watching the contemporary Olympic Games, which allegedly serve the cause of peace. Indeed, the popularity of the Olympic Games is in itself a symbolic expression of Western paganism. They celebrate the pagan hero: the winner, the strongest, the most self-assertive".
"People who are firm believers in Christ every bit the great lover, the cocky-sacrificing God, tin can plow this belief, in an alienated way, into the feel that information technology is Jesus who loves for them. Jesus thus becomes an idol; the belief in him becomes the substitute for one's own deed of loving. In a simple, unconscious formula: 'Christ does the all the loving for us; we tin continue in the design of the Greek hero, notwithstanding we are saved because the alienated 'faith' in Christ is a substitute for the imitation of Christ"
"Finally, I believe that man beings are so deeply endowed with a need to love that acting as wolves causes us necessarily to take a guilty conscience. Our professed conventionalities in beloved anesthetizes us to some degree against the pain of the unconscious feeling of guilt for being entirely without love"
"I cannot have a trouble, considering it is not a thing that tin can exist owned: it, however, tin can take me. That is to say, I have transformed myself into "a problem" and am now owned by my creation"
"Modern consumers may place themselves by the formula: I am = what I have and what I consume"
"The having mode of beingness is not established by an alive, productive process betwixt subject and object; information technology makes things of both object and discipline. The relationship is one of deadness, not aliveness"
...more
"I accept a trouble," or "I am troubled?"
"I have insomnia," or "I cannot sleep?"
In To Have or To Exist?, the psychologist Erich Fromm describes the having and the being modes of existence and argues for the latter. Do we alive in the realm of objects, to get them, to manage them, to secure them, to use them? Or practice we alive in the realm of experiences, to sense our surroundings, to relate to other, to understand ourselves?
Fromm published the book in 1976, but his analysis of order r
To have or to be?"I have a problem," or "I am troubled?"
"I have insomnia," or "I cannot sleep?"
In To Have or To BE?, the psychologist Erich Fromm describes the having and the existence modes of existence and argues for the latter. Do we live in the realm of objects, to get them, to manage them, to secure them, to use them? Or practise we alive in the realm of experiences, to sense our surroundings, to relate to other, to understand ourselves?
Fromm published the book in 1976, simply his analysis of guild remains relevant for our contemporary life. "Because the social club nosotros live in is devoted to acquiring property and making a turn a profit, nosotros rarely see any evidence of the beingness way of existence and most people see the having mode as the most natural fashion of existence, even the only acceptable way of life. All of which makes it specially difficult for people to comprehend the nature of the beingness mode, and even to empathize that having is just one possible orientation." Nosotros have seen some of the havoc, such every bit the recent recession, this imbalance between the ii modes could cause. This volume reveals to us the other mode of living, the beingness manner, and helps us understand the loonshit in which we live and the challenges we accept to overcome.
Fromm proposes that the new guild would bring about the new Human and he listed such an private's twenty-one traits, including "willingness to give upwardly all forms of having, in order to fully be." So, he believes that once we remove the external corrupting factors, nosotros tin can achieve such an platonic.
And I wonder whether he was in the having mode when he proposed such a solution.
However, I recommend this book for the insight into i dimension of the human condition—the dynamics between having and beingness. This book lays out the landscape of our gimmicky society forth this axis, and helps u.s. assess our mentality and way of life and navigate the obstacles betwixt the two modes of living. And though Fromm's new Man may seem utopian in light of our internal and external constraints, we tin strive toward a balance between having and being, knowing the journey may be as of import, if not more so, than the goal.
...more
I especially, like the style Fromm tears slowly and gradually our commonsensical behavior. Exist it, the views on love or sanity or living itself. He firstly presents the widely accepted belief of having in the modern society.
Having means the belief that the our relation is with an object. A having person derives meaning in life by possessing and accumulating products, ideologies, other people. This way of living is fairly common. Visibly,
Classic introduction on an important question: how to live?I peculiarly, like the mode Fromm tears slowly and gradually our commonsensical behavior. Be it, the views on love or sanity or living itself. He firstly presents the widely accepted belief of having in the modern society.
Having means the belief that the our relation is with an object. A having person derives meaning in life past possessing and accumulating products, ideologies, other people. This style of living is adequately common. Visibly, terrorists, nationalistic fanatics, middle classes, addicts. One identifies with the object to seek completion of the void within. The nearly dangerous consequence of this way is that the person is defenseless in a loop of passive fulfillment by frequent stimulations like soma, sports in BNW. Ascent anxiety and stress to secure these objects results in suspicion and isolation from other fellows. Fright of expiry follows as information technology will break the illusion of permanence with the object. Caught in distractions, there is little time to pay attention to the manipulations by leaders and companies. My thoughts over this mode is that it is building on the hypothesis that humans are greedy. They can be incentivized by lollipop of money and condition endlessly on the basis of a rat race. I think this hypothesis tin can easily be disproved. Even rich and successful people face severe depression and tin harm themselves. Buddha, existence well off, gave information technology up to costless the earth from suffering. At that place are compassionate qualities in humans like helping others during tsunami, raising vocalization confronting injustices like apartheid etc. I think near of the people are indoctrinated to pursue the path of excessive materialism. This is done by parents initially because they equate it with happiness. The other institutions like school, media, company etc also promote this mindset because of their vested interest.
The other alternative considered past Fromm is the beingness mode. Information technology is a state of activity. Hither he presents a important distinction between busyness and being agile. Being busy, is passive engagement with what one is doing. I was reminded of the truckloads of boring assignments I have to write in University. While, existence active is a active involvement with what 1 is doing. It can exist reading a nature poem, enjoying the rustling leaves. It is like beingness in the catamenia- doing effortlessly. In beingness, in that location is joy of enjoying world, without possession.like music, without ownership the CD. In that location is a fulfillment in quality living over quantity. Disquisitional thinking along with dear and empathy are important in this fashion. I am miles away from this style. Undoubtedly, a alter from exploiting to caring, blind obedience to disquisitional thinking, from anxiety to calmness will do the globe much skillful. The Noble path is dealt by Fromm in the book - art of being.
Fromm does refer to work of many spiritual teachers like Buddha, meister Eckhart, Jesus.
A background in it, would come handy to understand his works. His stardom of modes derives a lot from marx'southward theory of alienation. On Freud, I tin can't say much because I haven't read his piece of work.
Looking forward to more of his works. Information technology did assist me explicate my cerebral racket and bouts of insanity with the present society.
...more than As you lot read through the passages and chapters, y'all go the impressions that all is not doom and gloom. Fromm is an optimist and he offers his perspectives on what the "New Human" and the "New Guild" could perchance look like. He does this without the reader feeling as if information technology is an impossible utopian and unobtainable vision. On the other manus, the reader feels charged with a responsibility to run across through Fromm'due south vision. To have or to exist - at present that is the question. ...more
While is interesting in parts, It actually doesn't offering something groundbreaking if you are familiar with other marxist writings of the 20th century. Likewise Fromm sometimes falls into very superficial trappings and some kind of naivete when offering
Fromm here offers a kind of new ideals and spirituality based on cooperation and opposition to the individualistic values of capitalism. using early christianity, budhism and marxism as the ideological bases on which his proposed new human lodge rests.While is interesting in parts, Information technology really doesn't offer something groundbreaking if you are familiar with other marxist writings of the 20th century. Also Fromm sometimes falls into very superficial trappings and some kind of naivete when offering some of the "solutions" (1 of the lowest parts citing some malthusian-like investigation at one point, linking the electric current societal debacle to overpopulation) this volume is not really a deep historical and ideological analysis of any of the causes it exposes, nor does he get that deep into the intricacies on how unbridled consumerism operate, its more a guide for people to get to a new way of thinking most themselves and their human relationship with society through a new proposed grade of ethics.
...more than
The point of the book is to warn us that economic and ecological disaster is imminent unless a drastic change occurs in the human heart -- unless the predominate fashion of having gives mode to a mode of being. Our liberation from the having way is possible only through the full realization of industrial and political participatory democracy. To those who argue that possession, hoarding, and antagonism are inherent in the human condition, Fromm contends that a social structure determines the behavioural traits that become rooted patterns. Since both the having and the being modes are latent in homo nature, effecting the advisable change in social structure can simultaneously change the psychical motivations that undergird graphic symbol structure
He also offers a pattern of what some of these changes might await like: "A organization of constructive dissemination of effective data." "All brainwashing methods in industrial and political advertising must be prohibited." "Active participation in political life requires maximum decentralization throughout industry and politics." "Active and responsible participation . . . requires that humanistic management replace bureaucratic management." And: "Scientific research must be separated from application in manufacture and defense."
Much of this seems utopian on the surface, merely it's difficult to disagree with any of Fromm's points or conclusions. Sadly, few rallied around this book in 1976, and we seem edging even closer to the economic and ecological ending that was prophesied by scientists and intellectuals so many years ago. Our truthful enemies today, equally in 1976, are the continued meteoric ascension in population rates, the dominion by technocracy, manic consumerism, a megamachine that includes reigning industrial and armed forces complexes, massive corporate bureaucracies that are no less alienating to the worker than assembly line production, utterly deficient school systems, including academy, and of course automaton conformity...
...more
On the philosophical level, I deeply related to Fromm'south ideas about the causes of our emptiness and existential crises due to placing too much focus on a 'having' mode. Be it possessions, work, love, faith, learning. According to Fromm, the mode is besides self
Later finishing To have or to be?, it got among three almost important books I've read and then far. Its main theme is why our current arrangement fails at fulfilling us as man beings. And what we every bit its agents tin do about information technology to change the frustration.On the philosophical level, I securely related to Fromm's ideas most the causes of our emptiness and existential crises due to placing too much focus on a 'having' mode. Be it possessions, work, love, faith, learning. According to Fromm, the mode is also self-observing and alienating in guild to bring joy and fulfillment into our lives.
As an alternative, Erich proposes to comprehend a being style, which uses independence, presence and critical reason as its fundamentals. Like the teachings of Zen Buddhism, it emphasizes experiencing things, being in moment with them in contrast to the urge of possessing them.
The book is manner too short for addressing all our human challenges such equally loss of organized religion, the art of loving, power structures and the function of language and therefore suffers from existence academically superficial. While many ideas touch only lightly on those topics, it's a brilliant summary and a stimulus for further studies.
A few of my favorite quotes:
"Acceptance of the fact that nobody and nothing outside oneself give meaning to life."
"Every new step contains the danger of failure, and that is one of the reasons people are so agape of liberty."
"Pleasance and thrill are conducive to sadness after the and so-called peak has been reached; for the thrill has been experienced, but the vessel has non grown."
...more
Fromm, a Marxist, had long railed confronting commercialism and what he chosen the marketing orientation, which he saw as shallow, fulfilling only minor human needs, which anyway were in large measure created by advertising. He saw consumers as children, fabricated infantile by corporate gre
Fromm's major works were written in the 2d one-half of his life, with To Have Or To Be? the last piece of work before his death in 1980. To Have Or To Exist? is a kind of manifesto for a humane future, Fromm'south credo it could be said.Fromm, a Marxist, had long railed against commercialism and what he called the marketing orientation, which he saw as shallow, fulfilling just minor human needs, which anyhow were in large measure created by advert. He saw consumers as children, made infantile past corporate greed, which was itself rooted in human narcissism. To Have Or To Be? peered far into the time to come – very far I suspect – in order to describe what a humane future might expect similar. As such, the book was a statement of what Fromm knew humanity could become.
Fromm opens his work with a discussion of the difference betwixt the having orientation (experiencing life through owning things) and the being orientation (experiencing life through living). He not only looks at how modernistic people follow these orientations, he examines how the philosophers of the past have dealt with the themes, including his oft-quoted influence Main Eckhart. Later chapters compare diverse aspects of life in the 2 modes: security/insecurity, solidarity/antagonism, joy/pleasure, affirmation of life/fright of dying and then on, with the erstwhile of each pair in the existence mode and the latter in the having mode.
Role iii of the volume is the credo. In it, Fromm sets out how societies could change in terms of organized religion, social graphic symbol and then on. Features of 'the new society' are described, including what for me is possibly Fromm's most important contribution to the debate: what he called 'a new science of homo' (by which he meant human beings – he was a regrettably late convert to feminism). In my own work I've taken this clarion call for a new science of the human condition and merged it with the work of Nicholas Humphrey and others. Completing a scientific description of the human being status is in my opinion the most important task homo beings face up at the moment, since everything that could and should follow – like treating the planet with love and respect – comes every bit a outcome of understanding.
In summary: a ground-breaking, lucid, extraordinary work. I feel sure Fromm must accept known he was at the end of his life when he wrote this. He was 76, and had simply four years of life remaining. But his exceptional legacy lives on.
...more than
I was editing an essay today that I wrote a while back. 1 of the sentences was near how father's spend much more than time at work than with their children. The phrase 'spending fourth dimension' didn't sit well with me, but it was really hard to retrieve of an alternative. It honestly wasn't until I recalled Fromm that I
I read this book last summer, and I recall it has had an bear on on my manner of thinking. It volition be forth time before I'm able to fully appreciate and enact the 'prescription' given here by Fromm.I was editing an essay today that I wrote a while dorsum. Ane of the sentences was about how father's spend much more fourth dimension at work than with their children. The phrase 'spending time' didn't sit down well with me, but it was actually hard to think of an alternative. It honestly wasn't until I recalled Fromm that I came up with the alternative: being with your children, or existence at work. It seems like a pretty elementary phrase to swap, merely it felt awkward to write, even now.
Fifty-fifty fourth dimension is something we 'have'.
...more 
Our biological urge for survival tends to further the having mode. Even though, the biological needs of humans are relatively limited, in that location is no end for mentally-and-socially-created needs.
In contrast, in the beingness mode of existence, one neither has nor craves to have something (beyond their essential needs), but is joyous, employs one's faculties productively, and is 1 to the world. This mode is based on aliveness and authentic relatedness to the world and tends to view life as a process of becoming. A person in this fashion accomplishes joy and well-being through growing closer to their inner potentials. The internal desires for love, sharing, and solidarity encourage this perspective to life. In a sense, the deviation between the two modes is that of egotism (having mode) and altruism (being mode).
Fromm explains subtle differences between the 2 behavioral patterns in daily experiences of life. He describes how experiences such as conversing, learning, loving, exercising authority, and practicing organized religion can exist done differently in the two modes. Equally an example, having knowledge is a possessional attitude that believes in cognition every bit a material that can be piled up, whereas, in the existence mode, knowing is a productive process to strive critically and actively to approach the truth. In the being manner, 1 is not enslaved by their knowledge and, every bit said by Miester Eckhart, even forgets that i knows. Fromm writes, "Literacy is by no means the blessing it is advertised to exist, especially when people use it just to read fabric that impoverishes their capacity to experience and imagine."
In the context of loving, Fromm says that for those who must have what they like, the mutual enjoyment of interpersonal relations habitually results in the desire for sexual possession. Nevertheless, for those in a ascendant manner of being, the other person is enjoyable, and even erotically attractive, but he or she does not have to be owned in gild to be enjoyed.
The book contains thoughts of many historical masters of living, such as Buddha, Jesus, Miester Eckhart, Spinoza, Albert Schweitzer, Karl Marx, on the matter of the difference between the having and being orientations to life.
The final third of the book explains the necessity of social changes to weaken the dominance of the having manner, describes the challenges faced in making such changes, and offers thoughts on how to move forth this path. Fromm believes a radical inner change towards existence must exist accompanied past a radical humanistic social movement.
As Fromm argues, human self-activeness is paralyzed in a capitalist system, in which people submit themselves to the market place rather than pursuing self discovery and actualization. Fromm distinguishes between activeness (that is supposed to meet subjectively-felt needs of humans) and mere busy-ness of modern humans with their jobs and lives that is often passive and only forced based on objectively-valid needs. This causes a sense of alienation that is unremarkably felt by virtually mod humans.
The idea of "marketing personality" in a cybernetic social club is described in the third section of the volume. As Fromm explains, the current man in the market does not merely offer their skills and abilities to complete the tasks of their job, but also puts their personality beyond every bit a commodity. Such a grapheme does not feel attachment to the object of their job and can be manipulated to accomplish needs of market place. In other words, the aim of marketing personality is complete adaptation and proper functioning. Unfortunately, the intelligence of such characters tin can be manipulated towards dangerous self-destructive aims.
Fromm emphasizes the demand for shifts towards "sane consumption" and "participatory commonwealth" as productive activities required on the path of realizing the new society. Explaining the imminent threats of the current club, he speaks of the need for a new ethic in the use of material resource and a new attitude toward nature that is based on harmony rather than conquest. Equally he says, for the commencement time in human being'south life on earth, they are existence asked to refrain from doing what they can practice, they are beingness asked to restrain their technological and economic advancement.
Overall, the book intelligently weaves issues in human psychology with challenges of current society and provides wise suggestions on making improvements in both areas.
...more than The writer introduces the modalities with examples from every mean solar day life - studying, working, etc.. - so proceeds to explicate in detail the differences betwixt the modalities, last the book with a reflection on how to instantiate a "social club of being" from where we are at.
I remember that the distinction he makes in the book is meaningful, as I was able to relate many examples and ideas to
I enjoyed reading this book. It'due south an essay on the "two modalities" of living that the author identified.The writer introduces the modalities with examples from every 24-hour interval life - studying, working, etc.. - and then proceeds to explain in item the differences between the modalities, concluding the book with a reflection on how to instantiate a "society of being" from where nosotros are at.
I remember that the stardom he makes in the volume is meaningful, equally I was able to relate many examples and ideas to my personal experience. However, it falls short on justifying this dichotomy, as information technology seems drawn from personal experience and anecdotal evidence.
Moreover, what I felt the most was that while "having" was clearly defined and I was really able to visualize it, it seemed like "existence" was more the lack of the "having" modality than a thing that exists per se. I call back that the writer but describes an observed degeneracy of our modernistic social club, more than identifying ii ways of living that are eternal and immutable.
But overall, I think that many ideas in the volume make it worth reading.
...more 
The book is the fiftieth book in a series called World Perspectives. It intends to demonstrate man'south capacity and ability in line with the nowadays
"To Take Or To Be" is a great book. Erich Fromm was a psychoanalyst in the same vein every bit Sigmund Freud. Fromm discusses the dichotomy between "having" something and "being" something. The difference might seem bland, only in reality, it underlies our central philosophies. A person can either be ill or have a cold. The meaning is non the same for Fromm.The volume is the fiftieth book in a series called World Perspectives. It intends to demonstrate man'due south capacity and power in line with the nowadays time. The book is from 1976 and gathers pieces from Fromm's previous works.
...more than
Information technology'due south on you.
Are you having a good girlfriend, or are you beingness a good one? To have or to Be?Information technology's on you.
...more
Every affiliate is pervaded by this message: Alter! Be! Don't worry nearly having! A naive bulletin in retrospect given today's problems. The message is inspired by the generation of '68 although Fromm is non so naive to not recognize the downfall of the '68 movement already apparent in the mid 70'south. He acknowledges the turn of the attention of the rebellious youth towards more trivial individual problems. Esoteric and buddhistic ideas of individual fulfillment are part of the solution but not the answer in itself.
All the same my mostly negative view on Fromm's aim, there are topics worth thinking virtually. I particulary liked the chapter on the marketing graphic symbol and the cybernetic religion. Leaving bated the obsoleted expression of cybernetic, this chapter offers deep insight into the workings of mod human. The marketing character of individuals has never been every bit obvious as it is now with Trump being voted President. Information technology'south all most selling oneself as good as possible. A character similar this tin easily adapt any confidence bringing turn a profit. Individuals with a caring being volition endure, the psychopaths thrive easily. A lilliputian more 'being' instead of 'having' on a societal level would become a long way.
Nevertheless, I cannot recommend this book. To illustrate my example, here'south Fromm's proposed agenda for a new spiritual base of operations of society:
"- Der erste Schritt auf dieses Ziel hin ist die Ausrichtung der Produktion auf einen gesunden und vernünftigen Konsum. [Fromm'south proposal: institute an expert panel directing production!]
- Gesunder und vernünftiger Konsum ist nur möglich, wenn wir das Recht der Aktionäre und Konzernleitungen, über ihre Produktion ausschließlich vom Standpunkt des Profits und Wachstums zu entscheiden, drastisch einschränken. [proposal: militant consumer organizations]
- Um eine am Sein orientierte Gesellschaft aufzubauen, müssen all ihre Mitglieder sowohl ihre ökonomischen als auch ihre politischen Funktionen aktiv wahrnehmen [...]. [proposal: participatory republic]
- Die aktive Mitbestimmung im politischen Leben erfordert maximale Dezentralisierung von Wirtschaft und Politik. [proposal: disempower primal powers]
- Aktive und verantwortungsvolle Mitbestimmung ist nur möglich, wenn das bürokratische durch ein humanistisches Direction ersetzt wird. [proposal: no strict rules, empathic assistants]
- In der kommerziellen und politischen Werbung sind alle Methoden der Gehirnwäsche zu verbieten. [yeah, right]
- Die Kluft zwischen den reichen und den armen Nationen muss geschlossen werden. [get-go fourth dimension, he got it right]
- Viele Übel der heutigen kapitalistischen und kommunistischen Gesellschaften wären durch die Garantie eines jährlichen Mindesteinkommens zu beseitigen. [supposition: it'due south less expensive for a order to pay a base income to everybody instead of paying the negative consequences of unhappy beings]
- Die Frauen sind von der patriarchalischen Herrschaft zu befreien. [I judge this was mandatory in whatever seventy'south pamphlet]
- Ein Oberster Kulturrat ist ins Leben zu rufen, der die Aufgabe chapeau, die Regierung, die Politiker und die Bürger in allen Angelegenheiten, die Wissen und Kenntnis erfordern, zu beraten. [first fellow member E. Fromm?]
- Ein wirksames Arrangement zur Verbreitung von objektiven Informationen ist zu etablieren. [aka Lügenpresse, fake news, culling facts]
- Dice wissenschaftliche Grundlagenforschung ist von der Frage der industriellen und militärischen Anwendung zu trennen. [who volition pay?]
- Eine unabdingbare Voraussetzung einer neuen Gesellschaft ist die atomare Abrüstung. [balance of power?]
Did the readers in the 70'due south really believe this? I could accept accepted this every bit satire just I'thou baffled that a reputated scientist could earnestly propose such a mess of absurd ideas as the pattern for a new society. It would be fun to see Erich Fromm and Ayn Rand discuss the future of society.
...moreFromm's theory is a rather unique blend of Freud and Marx. Freud, of form, emphasized the unconscious, biological drives, repression, and
Erich Fromm, Ph.D. (Folklore, University of Heidelberg, 1922), was a psychoanalyst and social philosopher who explored the interaction between psychology and society, and held various professorships in psychology in the U.Due south. and Mexico in the mid-20th century.Fromm's theory is a rather unique blend of Freud and Marx. Freud, of course, emphasized the unconscious, biological drives, repression, and so on. In other words, Freud postulated that our characters were determined by biology. Marx, on the other hand, saw people as determined by their guild, and most especially past their economic systems.
...moreNews & Interviews
Nobody but a defeated, deflated, pathetic testimony to a wrong way of living."
Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/25490
0 Response to "To Have or to Be Fromm Bloomsbury Review"
Post a Comment